"I am the president of a condo association. Our units are now 18 years old and need to be re-roofed. We have a few elderly men in our community who insist that we lay over the existing shingles rather than tear off and shingle. They say the difference of the life of the two methods is two years. We’ve had many, many leaks over the years. Apparently the valleys were put in wrong. The leaks happen mainly when we have hard rains, but they have leaked other times. My question is, can we lay over roofs that leak? And is it accurate that the difference of the lifespan of the two methods is two years Thank you very much for your attention to this, and I look forward to your response."
Barbara, In my opinion, it is a far better job to remove all roofs, leaky or not, then attach the new roof directly to the deck.
Here is why:
Doing a recover saves money in tear-off cost but with a leaking roof unseen dry rot is hard to repair and discovery later will cost you more in the long run. Your leaky valleys could have many issues you can not see without removing the roof.
Most manufacturers warranty the roof the same, torn off or not. A recovery or “layover” is an acceptable installation with certain preparation done.
A proper recovery should have this prep done:
This cost can run upwards of 35 % of the cost of a tear-off.
Why people don’t tear off a roof.
Barbara, I hope this short answer helps you and your association.
Send photos of your roofs for a better understanding of your project, I am interested in what happens.
Have a question? AskARoofer.
Find your local roofing contractor in the RoofersCoffeeShop® Contractor Directory.
The Importance of Color and Metal RoofsRead More ...
Why Replace Your Roof When it Could be Restored?Read More ...
Above and Beyond: Testing DECRA Metal RoofingRead More ...